In the discussion between Jo and Chris regarding position sensitivity, who was correct?

In the context of position sensitivity, both individuals can be considered correct if their perspectives highlight different aspects or interpretations of the subject. Position sensitivity refers to how the responsibilities and access levels associated with certain roles determine the degree of security measures required.

It's possible for Jo to present valid points regarding the implications of a specific role’s sensitivity, such as the need for strict vetting for positions that access classified or sensitive information. At the same time, Chris may bring up important considerations about the organizational policies that support or necessitate such distinctions in role sensitivity.

When multiple viewpoints are in agreement on the need for assessing position sensitivity but might differ in their approach or examples given, both parties contribute valuable insights that enhance understanding. This collaborative perspective on sensitive positions demonstrates the complexity of security practices, making it appropriate to conclude that both Jo and Chris are correct in their discussions.