What does a lapse in security clearance typically indicate?

A lapse in security clearance typically indicates that the individual has not met the required re-investigation timelines. Security clearances are not indefinite; they require periodic reviews to reassess an individual's eligibility based on current criteria, which include personal conduct, financial responsibility, and any potential foreign influence concerns, among other factors.

When an individual fails to meet these timelines, it signifies a gap in their evaluation process, which can lead to a temporary inability to access classified information. This lapse does not inherently reflect misconduct or failure to follow protocols but rather highlights the importance of timely compliance with established re-investigation procedures to maintain continuous security clearance.

In contrast, failing to follow security protocols or being under investigation for misconduct would point to specific issues that could lead to a clearance suspension or revocation, while transitioning to a higher security role typically involves a review process that aims to ensure that the individual is suitable for the new responsibilities, rather than resulting in a lapse in security clearance.