What is a potential outcome of a negative adjudicative process?

A negative adjudicative process typically results in a decision that a person does not meet the necessary criteria for a security clearance based on the information gathered during the investigation. This outcome indicates that the individual's background, behavior, or circumstances do not align with the standards required to ensure national security and trustworthiness. The adjudication process assesses various factors such as criminal history, financial stability, and personal conduct.

In the event that these factors lead to concerns about reliability or loyalty, the most direct consequence is the denial of security clearance. This decision is made to protect sensitive information and ensure that individuals in positions of trust are fully compliant with the established security requirements. Consequently, while other outcomes like suspension of clearance status or mandatory training could arise from different scenarios or conditions, the denial of security clearance is the most definitive result of a negative adjudicative process.