Which of the following statements is true regarding rehabilitation and personnel security?

The statement that demonstrated rehabilitation can positively influence evaluations is true because personnel security assessments often consider an individual’s efforts to address and correct past issues. When a person shows genuine commitment to rehabilitating themselves—such as through counseling, treatment programs, or consistent positive behavior—these actions can indicate a change in character and reliability. Security evaluations are not solely based on past incidents; they also take into account how individuals have responded to these challenges over time.

Rehabilitation signifies personal growth and responsibility, which is critical in roles that involve trust and security. Evaluators look for trends in behavior and whether an individual has taken steps to mitigate past issues, reinforcing the belief that people can change for the better. Demonstrated rehabilitation assures decision-makers that the person has learned from their mistakes and can be counted on to act responsibly in the future.

In contrast, the other options suggest a neglect of the importance of rehabilitation or focus solely on past issues without acknowledging the potential for change, which is not aligned with modern approaches to personnel security assessments.